Parasites in Quail in the Rolling Plains Ecoregion of West Texas: Leadership of the Wildlife Toxicology Laboratory
The Rolling Plains Ecoregion of West Texas, an area approximately the size of the State of Michigan, has long been touted as one of the last great strongholds for wild quail hunting left in the United States. In 2010, good spring and summer rains, along with excellent habitat quality, foretold a promising season with abundant quail. However, come opening day, the quail had all but vanished with many landowners estimating a 70-90% decline in wild quail numbers on their properties. This sudden loss of quail captured the attention of many throughout the Rolling Plains, leading to the launch of the research program Operation Idiopathic Decline (OID) to investigate possible causes behind such a precipitous decline in quail populations. With research funding from the Rolling Plains Quail Research Foundation, Park Cities Quail, and Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, the OID initiative entailed extensive research on thousands of quail in 2011 and 2012. This initiative engaged multiple investigators from prominent universities throughout Texas to study the potential impacts of environmental contaminants, pesticides, diseases, and parasites on quail of the Rolling Plains. Initially, The Wildlife Toxicology Laboratory (WTL), with tremendous support from Texas Tech University, worked with the OID initiative conducting research on environmental contaminants and pesticides (Baxter et al. 2015; Turaga et al. 2016; Dunham et al. 2017; Pappas, et al. 2017). Then in 2012, the WTL shifted focus to address the question of parasites as a potential mechanism contributing to quail declines in the Rolling Plains.
Head of a parasitic eyeworm
Although parasites had been previously reported in quail of the Rolling Plains prior to OID, their significance was considered largely inconsequential. However, research associated with OID has shed new light on the potential of parasites, particularly the eyeworm (Oxyspirura petrowi), to impact quail populations in the Rolling Plains, and the WTL has been at the forefront of this research. Since 2012, we have implemented extensive and continuous field and laboratory projects to evaluate eyeworm infections in wild quail, which subsequently expanded to include another parasite affecting quail in the region, the caecal worm (Aulonocephalus pennula). Because questions regarding the potential significance of these parasitic infections in wild quail are very complex, the WTL adheres to a meticulous forensics-like approach, which we have termed “weight of the evidence”, in order to evaluate the significance of these infections. As we continue to utilize this method, we build a strong scientific foundation to better understand the role and significance of parasitic infection in wild quail at both the individual and population level by synthesizing data gained from field and laboratory studies and input from landowners and quail hunters, as well as our own personal observations.
As a result of this exhaustive and comprehensive approach, the WTL has documented eyeworms in songbirds (Dunham and Kendall 2014), Lesser Prairie-Chickens (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) (Dunham et al 2014), and Gambel’s (Callipepla gambelii), Scaled (Callipepla squamata), and Northern bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) (Dunham and Kendall 2016). Furthermore, Dunham et al. (2016a) has demonstrated the widespread prevalence of eyeworms, as bobwhite from 29 counties in the Rolling Plains were found to be infected with this parasite. The WTL was also the first to document an eyeworm epizootic in wild quail of the Rolling Plains, revealing the alarming speed with which these infections can occur (Dunham et al. 2014). Additionally, in our studies, we have closely investigated the eyes of infected birds. Unlike previous studies that only reported eyeworms on the surface of the eye and under the nictitating membrane, we noted that eyeworms were also concentrated in the intraorbital glands that are important for tear production and immune function, such as the lacrimal duct and Harderian gland (Dunham et al. 2015). These findings spurred subsequent investigation into the pathological consequences of eye worm infection. During this investigation, the WTL found that infected quail can have severe damage to the eyes and associated tissues (Dunham et al. 2016b). While more work is needed to evaluate the potential impact these infections may have on quail survival, this evidence of damage associated with eyeworm infection supports widespread anecdotal reports of quail flying into objects, such as barns, houses, fences, and trucks, in the Rolling Plains. For those of us familiar with wild quail, we can attest to their incredible ability to navigate seemingly impenetrable brush. This allows them to escape many of their enemies, including formidable aerial predators such as the Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperi). As such, these instances of quail flying at full speed into large and highly visible objects are not only surprising but may also indicate potentially compromised vision.
In the course of this research, we have developed infection level thresholds to gauge the intensity of eye worm infection in wild quail (Dunham et al. 2017a), and we continue to closely monitor parasite levels in the Rolling Plains. Additionally, this study revealed that another parasitic nematode, the caecal worm, is even more abundant in wild quail from the Rolling Plains than eyeworms. This is an alarming observation considering that similar parasites have been known to negatively affect host nutrition and reproduction. Henry et al. (2017a) hypothesized that the caecal worm may be impairing the caecum function as it has been associated with lower vitamin A, and Dunham et al. (2017b) found minimal amounts of digesta within the caecum of infected birds. Dunham further hypothesized that this may impact the survivability of the bobwhite in the winter. Furthermore, little is known about the impacts of multiple parasites and we have found quail in the Rolling Plains to often be heavily infected with both caecal worms and eyeworms.
Head of a parasitic caecal worm
We have also been able to document some very interesting situations with parasitic infection. For instance, on a research transect we have been working on for almost six years, we noted a precipitous decline in wild quail in the spring of 2017. At the same time, we saw an increase in parasitic infection and reported this in the scientific literature (Henry et al. 2017b). Additionally, landowners donated multiple quail to the WTL in 2017 after witnessing them fly into stationary objects, killed by a predator, or in a weakened state. Parasites were found in all of these samples, and while it is unknown whether parasites are responsible for these examples, it is an important possibility that must be considered (Brym et al. 2018a). We also received hunter-shot specimens from December 2017 – February 2018. In these samples, we found some of the highest average eyeworm and caecal worm burdens observed. This observation was followed by a decrease in parasite loads in these same areas, as well as hunters reporting increased difficulty in finding coveys of bobwhite and an apparent dramatic drop in quail numbers (Brym et al. 2018b). Because these parasitic nematodes are long-lived and once infection has occurred in quail they are not excreted, this suggests that highly infected bobwhite were dropping out of the population. Furthermore, we documented an increase in the muscle worm, Physaloptera sp., amidst the elevated burdens of eyeworms and caecal worms (Kalyanasundaram et al., 2018a). In 2018, we were also able to document that bobwhite had persistently high parasite burdens and began to decline well before the breeding season (Commons et al. 2019).
Caecal worms collected from one wild bobwhite quail
Considering the widespread prevalence and pathological consequences of these parasitic infections in wild quail of the Rolling Plains, as well as the predators and harsh environmental conditions that these birds must overcome on a daily basis, it is essential to understand how these parasites factor into the complex equation that governs quail survival. To address some of these factors, the WTL has successfully designed a Mobile Research Laboratory (MRL) in the Rolling Plains that utilizes state-of-the-art molecular techniques (Kistler et al. 2016; Kalyanasundaram et al., 2018b). A recent pilot study deployed the MRL and determined its accuracy and efficiency to be the same as that of a typical laboratory (Blanchard et al., 2018). During a pilot study, it was demonstrated that the MRL had the same accuracy and efficiency as a typical laboratory (Blanchard et al. 2018), and we have continued to implement the MRL and standardize the techniques. By doing this, we can now better determine infection level based on the qPCR results (Blanchard et al. 2019a). This will provide widespread non-lethal surveillance for parasitic infection in quail and will be invaluable for evaluating the epidemiology of these parasitic infections in our quail populations. These molecular techniques are also being implemented to predict seasonal infection of these parasites, and our recent paper demonstrates that temperature and precipitation can influence caecal worm and eyeworm reproduction, as well as caecal worm infection intensity (Blanchard et al. 2019).
Furthermore, identification of the intermediate hosts for these parasites may be an important factor to consider as parasitic infection may be precipitated by certain environmental condition and availability of the intermediate host (Henry et al., 2018). The WTL has been addressing this factor, and Kistler et al. (2016) and Henry et al. (2018) have identified various grasshoppers as potential intermediate hosts for both parasites.
As the story of these parasites continues to unfold, phylogenetic studies conducted by WTL will contribute to our understanding of the potential effects these parasites may have on bobwhite. These studies have revealed that the muscle worm is closely related to Wuchereria bancrofti (78%), a roundworm that causes lymphatic filariasis in humans and is known to increase susceptibility to other infections (Kalyanasundaram et al., 2018a). In addition, the eyeworm is closely related to the central African human eyeworm, Loa loa (96% at the genomic level) and the European/eastern Asian human and carnivore eyeworm, Thelazia callipaeda (92%) (Kalyanasundaram et al., 2018c). Both eyeworms reportedly cause severe visual impairment and inflammation in the eyes of their hosts, which elevates our concern for the quail eyeworm. Furthermore, the caecal worm is more than 90% related to the ascarid, or roundworm, of dogs and cats (Kalyanasundaram et al., 2017). We have also begun evaluating the impacts of these parasites on the immune system of bobwhite by developing qPCR primers to monitor immune reaction. Following a challenge experiment, there was a measurable immune reaction in response to eyeworm and caecal worm glycoproteins (Kalyanasundaram et al. 2019). As all of us that have hunting dogs know, regular treatment for ascarids is necessary to maintain their performance and prevent death. Should we not have similar concerns then for a highly related worm, the quail caecal worm?
According to Texas Parks and Wildlife Roadside Count Quail Data, we have gone from one of the highest bobwhite quail populations in the Rolling Plains in 2016 to the third lowest on record in 2018. How could this be? With extensive field monitoring by personnel within WTL involving literally thousands of hours of field trapping and surveillance of wild bobwhite quail in the Rolling Plains, we identified a major loss of quail in the early spring period of 2018, which substantially reduced the breeding capital of wild quail going into the summer of 2018 (Commons et al 2019). In addition, in 2018, parasitic infection levels of caecal and eyeworms were higher than or similar to levels in previous years and the pattern continues that when the WTL identifies high parasitic infection levels in wild quail, this coincides with drops in numbers of wild quail on our field research transects, requiring tremendously increased effort to trap a quail, see a quail, or even hear one (Commons et al 2019).
While there are abundant treatment options for parasites infecting cats and dogs, there are no options for wild quail. However, we are well on our way to developing a solution for these parasitic infections in wild quail and are working closely with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We are contributing data to support FDA-requested scientific information to develop a suitable treatment for parasite infection in wild northern bobwhite quail. Although the results to date have been very promising, all of this takes time and extensive research in both the laboratory and the field.
Dr. Ron Kendall
Since 2012, Dr. Ron Kendall at the Wildlife Toxicology Lab (WTL) at Texas Tech University has worked to assess the impacts of eyeworms (Oxyspirura petrowi) and caecal worms (Aulonocephalus pennula) on quail. The WTL has greatly expanded the knowledge for what we know and what we think; the WTL continues to work tirelessly address what we don’t know and to answer the questions for where we’re headed.
What We Know
These are two adult female and two adult male eyeworms removed from a wild northern bobwhite quail from the Rolling Plains of West Texas. If the size of these eyeworms in a wild quail were extrapolated to infection in the eye of a human, they would approach toothpick size. This is why we are so concerned about these eyeworm infections in our wild bobwhites.
- Very common throughout the Rolling Plains with 80-90% of birds infected (up to 100% in some areas)
- Worms are longer than a dime
- Over 1700 worms have been found in a single bird
- Has been associated with gross pathology, distension of the caeca, and lack of digesta; thus providing a mechanism for reduced fitness, including weight loss
- 90% related at the DNA level to the Ascarid, or roundworm, of dogs and cats which if left untreated can cause weight loss, malnutrition, and eventual death
- 13 different species of grasshoppers have been identified as potential intermediate hosts
- New molecular techniques are available to allow for on-site, non-lethal sampling of quail to detect caecal worm infection
- Epizootic event in 2013 demonstrated the potential for rapid spread of infection
- Very common throughout the Rolling Plains with 50-70% of birds infected (up to 100% in some areas)
- Rolling Plains is the hot spot for infection; often 8X more prevalent in bobwhite from Rolling Plains vs South Texas Plains
- Worms are large (longer than a penny)
- 107 worms found in a single bird
- Feed on tissues and glands within the eyes and nasal sinuses
- Cause scarring of the cornea as well as damage to other eye tissues; thus providing a mechanism for reduced vision and/or fitness and explains reports of quail flying into stationary objects
- Several potential intermediate hosts including wood roaches, field crickets, and several species of grasshoppers
- 96% related at the DNA level to the Loa loa, a central African human eyeworm known to cause blindness
- New molecular techniques are available to allow for on-site, non-lethal sampling of quail to detect eyeworm infection
What We Think
- Eyeworms reduce vision and likely predispose quail to predators, flying into objects (e.g., barns, fences, trees), and difficulty finding food.
- Caecal worms deplete nutrients and may lead to malnutrition, energy loss, reduced breeding potential, increase susceptibility to extreme environmental conditions, and impair their ability to evade predators
- Parasitic infection suppresses the immune system which may leave quail susceptible to secondary infections
- Because parasites are long-lived, over time an infection may increase until it is eventually fatal, ultimately reducing populations
- Even low infections may tip the scales against quail in an already challenging environment, e.g. Cooper’s Hawk predation
- Implementation of a medicated feed (“Quail Guard”) twice annually (Spring and Late Summer) will reduce parasitic infection in wild quail populations and allows for sustainable/huntable quail population
- Based on the “weight of the evidence” as well as field and laboratory data, we believe that quail are impaired by parasitic infection and their reproduction and survival are reduced
What We Don’t Know (At This Point)
- How many parasites can a quail harbor before they are impaired? Is it a linear relationship or is it dependent on the bird, like people and alcohol consumption?
- How does the availability of infected intermediate hosts vary from one year to the next?
- Is there an effect on the immune system of quail? Do high infections leave them more susceptible to other diseases?
- Can the “boom and bust” cycles of quail be reduced by addressing parasite-related concerns?
- What are the consequences of multiple parasite species?
Where we’re headed
- A medicated feed has been developed which we hope earns FDA approval soon and becomes available in 2020
- WTL has deployed a Mobile Research Laboratory and will continue to monitor parasitic infection in quail throughout the Rolling Plains
- WTL is conducting laboratory studies to evaluate how parasites affect vision
- WTL is conducting studies to evaluate bobwhite immune response to parasitic infection
- WTL will continue to add to the “weight of the evidence” supporting the hypothesis that parasites are affecting wild quail, and we are presently writing a scientific paper to support our “weight of the evidence” approach.